Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
An email is circulating about the upcoming census pointing out that some people are sick of being treated like foreigners in their own country. But if these 'proud New Zealanders' don't want to be treated like foreigners perhaps it's time they stopped acting like foreigners?
Certainly it seems unfair for someone to be treated like an unwelcome invader in the land of their birth. By all means let's have an inclusive sense of nationalism that recognises our shared heritage. For a start how about we learn our national language, Te Reo Maori? Sure learning a second language is excellent mental stimulation and English is handy as an international trade language (although a lot harder to learn than Esperanto). It allows us to chew the fat with our commonwealth cousins and linguistically-impoverished countries like the USA who, lacking a language of their own, have happily mangled the Queen's English into Standard American.
Many people from Tangata Pasifika, Asian, European, Arabic and African nations also speak excellent English but you won't find most of them speaking it around the dinner table. They proudly rear their children speaking their native tongue and teach them English for the same reason they teach them reading and mathematics. 'Proud New Zealanders' would be watching Maori TV at every opportunity, regularly (and accurately) using whatever Maori words they know and supporting Te Reo in the standard school curriculum.
Secondly, let's dispense with the practice of referring to these fair islands as 'New Zealand'. That name was plastered onto this country like a sold sticker on a Warehouse BBQ by a Dutch vagrant who never even set foot here. Now there are many admirable things about the Dutch such as their pioneering use of wind power and their federal democracy which values individual and local sovereignty over national sovereignty, allowing cannabis use to be legal in Amsterdam for example. But we are not Dutch and a proud national of these lands would call them Aotearoa, a much more poetic name ('long white cloud' beats out 'new sea land' every time) and one that had been in use for hundreds of years before Abel Tasman wandered past claiming everything he saw for the fatherland.
That leaves us in a bit of a quandary about what to call ourselves. Somehow 'Aotearoans' and 'Aotearese' just don't have the right ring to them as well as being a disgraceful mangling of a beautiful Maori word (like using an 's' to pluralise Maori as in 'bloody mowris'). One of the first things we will learn about Te Reo is the prefix 'nga', 'ngai' or 'ngati' meaning 'people of' so how about 'Ngati Aotearoa'?
For more informal use there is always the tried and true 'kiwi' (but not 'kiwis'!). Some people are embarrassed by this identification with our national bird but I think the comparison is apt. Most of us are humble, down-to-Earth people whose aspirations to live on the land as best we can is constantly under attack by introduced predators (multinational corporations, land speculators etc) while our natural heritage is destroyed by exotic pests (unsustainable and ugly developments, toxic chemicals, genetically modified organisms, coal mines etc).
Speaking of national symbols maybe it's time we had our own flag, perhaps with a kiwi on it? Perhaps we could simply replace the British Union Jack in the flag with the Tino Rangatiratanga flag, symbolising the 'mana motuhake' of a proudly independent island population? Some proud Ngati Aotearoa get rather upset at the idea of changing the flag but surely even a plain black flag would be better than being represented by the Ozzie flag with one less star? Sure I know there are other differences but can you tell them apart a five hundred paces while they are blowing in the winds of Whanganui a Tara? I didn't think so.
Of course such a change would be comparable to a teenage girl smearing foundation over white heads if it didn't prompt us to have a serious look at the woeful undemocracy of the New Zealand state. Most people I speak to agree that politicians of whatever colour or pattern are mostly unaccountable to the will of the people once elected and tend towards policies that benefit the small fraction of the population that controls most of the wealth generated by everyone's work. Our government is like the head of one of those round-bottomed toys, always bouncing back to the top whether you knock it left or right. Sure this is more fun the flat-bottomed version we had before MMP when nothing really moved at all but I'd like to think proud Ngati Aotearoa could do better.
Our country has a a Bill of Rights (Act) and a Declaration of Independence, signed in 1835 by many Maori leaders prior to Te Tiriti o Waitangi but 'the powers that be' continually refuse to recognise these or be bound by their terms. The 'Maori parliament' that ratified the Declaration recognised the importance of decision-making power (sovereignty) being exercised at the community scale where every person can influence decisions that will affect their lives. This too is part of our heritage and any proud kiwi would spend at least a few hours a week watering the seeds of true democracy - "government of the people, for the people BY the people" or "an (without) archos (imposed control)".
Most importantly let's take some pride in our whakapapa, our geneology. We are all 'boat people' but our forebears arrived on many different kinds of boats and I can think of no good reason not to celebrate this part of our shared heritage. A proud kiwi would be secure in their sense of personal identity and be proud to tell anyone who asked about their ethnic origins, including the census.
Fraternally yours
Danyl Strype
Proud pakeha kiwi of Ngati Aotearoa
Related



Comments
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
I too have received that silly circular e mail. I think the ethnicity question in its present form is good for two reasons. In the first place, it is very useful for gathering information which activists and lobbyists as well as the government and academics can use. The Statistics NZ site is a great resource for anyone researching aspects of New Zealand society.
But there's also the point that ethnic idenities give us a much better handle on reality than waffly categories like 'New Zealander' or 'Kiwi'. Because of the shape that our history has taken and our society has assumed, ethnic categories are sadly important to the lives of the people who bear them. They are often a big influence on schooling, job prospects, and all sorts of other aspects of people's lives.
By contrast, the notion of a New Zealand identity is essentially a fantasy. The whole idea that one should be 'proud' to be a New Zealander is rather meaningless, and the 'we all came on waka, some were bigger and later than others' spiel we get from right-wing radio hosts and politicians is frankly a crock of shit designed to obscure the utterly different histories and circumstances of different sections of New Zealand society. The 'I'm Ngati Pakeha, I wear a bone carving and like the Treaty' line we get from theorists of Pakeha nationalism like Michael King is not much better.
The reason so many Europeans are getting uppity over the ethnic question is that the question brings them back down to earth, forcing them to recognise for a moment that not every group living in this country has the same culture and values as them, and that the notion of a common New Zealand culture and set of values is their own self-serving creation.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
I note that both the Libertarianz are in appropriate company with the apolitical rump of the McGillicuddy Serious Party in calling for a census boycott.
I'm pretty happy with 'Pakeha' as an ethnic identity. 'European' is more of a cultural identity than an ethnic one, given the mix of races in Europe. It seems to me appropriate that my ethnicity be defined by the indigenous people of this country, and that's the name they gave me. I've never been referred to as 'Ngati Pakeha' by Maori, and the term 'ngati' seems to normally be associated with iwi these days. Though I'd be happy to adopt it if Maori suggest it.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
When I learned Te Reo Maori at high school the first we thing we were taught was to recite mihi - an introduction of who we are and where we come from. It was the first time I'd given these questions any serious thought. Our kaiako, a native Maori speaker of Ngati Kahungunu decent told us that 'ngati pakeha' and 'ngati tiriti' were both appropriate when stating our iwi.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
Deferring to Maori, as though they had some sort of 'authentic' identity which could confer a certain legitimacy on you as 'Pakeha', doesn't seem to me much more sensible than celebrating Kiwiness in the way that Gerry Brownlee wants us to do.
While I support the right of Maori to self-determination that doesn't mean Maori nationalism is something I'd want to celebrate. It too is based on a set of myths which confer a spurious ense of unity onto groups, and especially classes, with different sets of interests.
Take the myth of the Maori warrior: I remember how CWG and AIC member Justin Taua went on Radio Waatea a couple of years ago to promote the anti-war movement and had a crack at this one, aguing that the Maori Battalion was not something that should be celebrated but rather a force which helped imperialism oppress the tangata whenua of countries like Palestine and Egypt. He then went on to point out the role some Maori have played as mercenaries for imperialism in virtually every major conflict of the last hundred years. Listeners erupted in fury, because they had been fed the same sort of rubbish that the rest of us get - the only difference that they got it under the guise of Maori pride where we got it under the guise of 'Kiwi' pride.
Willie Jackson, who manages Radio Watea, had backed the invasion of Afghanistan because the SAS was mostly Maori and 'the boys' wanted to keep Maori pride alive by upholding the warrior tradition in the Middle East.
I think we can recognise the role that ethnicity plays in our society without valourising that role and the ethnic cliches it creates.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
Yup, but an iwi isn't an ethnicity and I don't think I have anything that could reasonably be described as an iwi. My ancestors did, but it's well and truly defunt.
You seem to be tilting at windmills, Scott. I don't really get what this suggestion of Maori having an 'authentic' identity has to do with anything much (or the comments on the Maori battalion). I thought we were discussing ethnicity. If I was asked my 'identity' I'd have to give quite a different and lengthy answer.
Don't know what Gerry Brownlee wants, though I don't mind celebrating 'Kiwiness' per se, it's the culture I grew up in and like it or not, I'm stuck with it. And there's a lot about it I'm very happy with.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
"Yup, but an iwi isn't an ethnicity"
By its current use you would think it was Maori for corporation but it isn't. As I understand it ethnicity is exactly what iwi means.
"I don't think I have anything that could reasonably be described as an iwi. My ancestors did, but it's well and truly defunt."
I think you may mean hapu rather than iwi. I stand open to correction from any native Maori speakers reading this.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
I have to say I am a bit surprised that no one on this thread at all challenges the need or the right of the state to collect this information. Does anyone actually believe that the state will build more cheap homes if they know exactly how many poor people live in Otara? Or suddenly include Marae in district plans if more people tick the appropriate ethnicity? Does anyone think that the absence of public transport in Auckland is due to a lack of information about the size of the population?
On the contrary, the information will be used to plan the next prison site (in areas where lots of people have identified as Maori) and future rubbish dumps (low income areas). Since when are people so naive to believe that the information we give will not exclusively be used against us?
The reason why the state is forcing us (under threat of draconian fines) to fill this form out and provide our full name, date of birth and adress, is because it's the next best thing to having a personal ID system, without the nasty taste of such a system. And together with the digital photo drivers licence, the census creates a nice profile.
The dodgiest thing, however is that whoever fills out the dwelling form is being held legally responsible for anyone else in the house who doesn't fill out their form.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
you the man!
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
I dunno Marcus, sounds a little paranoid. If you're into activism the SIS probably knows more about you than the census could ever discover. I actually think a lot of politicians would like to junk some of the questions in the census, as a way of suppressing data on social problems like poverty and its uneven distribution across ethnic groups. It's a fact that this data has been used a lot by advocates of progressive social policies - anti-poverty campaigners like Susan St John for instance. I've used it when I've written political articles. Try the Statistics NZ site out - you might be surprised how useful it can be.
Sam: my point, which I probably didn't express very well, was that making an acceptable Pakeha/Kiwi national identity dependent upon the approval of a Maori nation doesn't solve the problem, because Maori national identity itself is constructed rather than natural and draws on all sorts of myths. I think we are stuck with boring old European ethnicity, and attempts to transcend that by claiming some kind of national identity as Kiwis or (in the PC version) Pakeha are essentially exercises in obscurantism. Call me a minimalist...
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
Scott, first you call me paranoid and then you tell me that the SIS will probably have a file on me? My concern is not about political activists (the questionnaire is not asking about political opinion or activities). But do you seriously believe that the answers to questions 43 (did you look for paid work in the last 4 weeks) and 45 (if a paid job had been offered, would you have started) will not immediately be matched with the WINZ database? Come on!
Give me one example where the government has used census information to plan for the benefit of the population. I can't see any evidence that this is happening anywhere.
Explain this to me: if the census is for statistical purposes only, why do they need my full name, date of birth and signature? And remember that (unlike the voting papers, where the identification part is torn off) this information is kept together forever.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
"I think you may mean hapu rather than iwi."
No, I was thinking of Scots clans and the like, which seemed to see themselves much as iwi do. Actually I don't know a lot about my ancestors lifestyles and don't care about them much either.
I can't see how Maori from different iwi are different ethnic groups, the term 'Maori' (meaning something like 'ordinary') seemed to come into use to describe a people who saw themselves as a distinct group. 'Iwi' is more like 'nation', a political division.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
"I can't see how Maori from different iwi are different ethnic groups, the term 'Maori' (meaning something like 'ordinary') seemed to come into use to describe a people who saw themselves as a distinct group. 'Iwi' is more like 'nation', a political division."
Sam, just because you can't understand the way people choose to define their lives does not make your view any better or more appropriate. And lets remeber who gave the indigenous peoples of Aotearoa the name 'Maori', it was the early colonists and ethnographers who were intent and probably unable to see anything distinctive among Maori communities beyond their tribes and needed an adequate way of making laws applicable to all indigenous peoples, not just those based on tribal lines.
And are you insinuating that there is a difference between ethnicities and nations? If so i would be very interested in how and where you draw this line.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
"just because you can't understand the way people choose to define their lives does not make your view any better or more appropriate."
No, actually it makes my view worth rather less, which is why I was pointing out that I didn't understand the basis for using of 'iwi' and 'ethnicity' as synonyms, and wanted to debate the point. In any case, since I was debating with a person who defines himself as Pakeha, I wasn't disagreeing with the way people choose to define their lives.
The term 'Maori' seems to have been very quickly adopted by Maori when the necessity of defining themselves as different from other ethnic groups arose.
And, no, I wasn't 'insinuating' that there is a difference between 'ethnicity' and 'nations' - I was stating it directly. As I said, 'Nation' is a political concept. Hence, 'New Zealander' is a description of nationality, not ethnicity. There are many different etnicities within New Zealand.
Maori and Iwi
I was taught that prior to European arrival tangata whenua did not recognise a common ethnicity or nationality across the whole of Aotearoa. What they had was their functional living groups (hapu) and broader federal-type alliances of many hapu (iwi), usually sharing many family bonds across them. Thus their iwi was both their ethnic and national grouping.
The word Maori (yes, it does mean ordinary) was coined to distinguish them from tauiwi (foreigners) when they began to arrive and live here in significant numbers. Arguably this involved a philosophical move amongst Maori to recognising a common ethnicity comparable to the political move implied by the signing of the 1835 Declaration to recognise a common nation. But if you ask a Maori person what people they belong to they will tell you their iwi affiliations (if they know them) which implies to me that this is where their ethnic identification lies and that Maori is more of a nationality.
Once immigrants started having children here I imagine Maori would have realised it was unfair to call those children 'tauiwi', thus the emergence of the term 'pakeha'. Although my ancestors came from a number of countries in Europe I prefer 'pakeha' because 'European', like Maori, is not an ethncitiy but a relatively new term of identification covering people of many nationalities and ethnicities. The concept of a common European identity is mostly a defensive response to decolonisation struggles against imperial powers in Europe and more recently the constant barrage of US-dominated market globalisation.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
If people aren't prepared to do something as basic as to fill in their census forms then if they loss their jobs no dole form them!!! Plus if they have a crash on the road no ambulance will be sent to them. Face it this society will never be perfect so if people can't be bother to do something like the census then they don't deserve the benefits of it!!!!!
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
marcus does sound paranoid. maybe he has smoked too much pot.
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
If people were upset at doing the census why not make a mockey of it like me? For example I put Jedi/Sith for my reglious belief and rode to work in a helecopter gunship. Also, you don't have to give your real name to the census collector as they don't ask for proof of ID. Hope this helps for the next one in five years time.
(Toni piss off and leave Marcus alone as they have made some good points! Also, q your comments aren't helpful, so fuck off, too! As for everyone else it's good to see that they have made some positive comments. Keep it up!)
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
U rock!
Re: Ethnical Quandaries and the Census
I think Make the ensus a joke has hit the nail on the head. Make a mockery of it as to give bum results.