CRASH! A Look at Today's Financial Crisis in Plain English

in

A simple look at the current crisis and the farce that is capitalism. Printable pdf pamphlet included.

The current capitalist crisis can often be confused and distorted by the use of language totally foreign to most working people. Of course, this is to keep those in the know, in the know — while the rest of us are left to clean up their mess!

You’ll here a lot of terms thrown about in the media — bank guarantees, liquidity and solvency, credit, ‘bubbles’, bailouts etc. These are economic terms which try to shield the huge mess capitalism is in at the moment. We should look past the jargon and remember throughout this crisis, that the mess the economy is currently in is not an isolated incident, but the result of the capitalist system and all it’s inherent failings. In fact, this type of crisis is nothing new, only in an uncharted form.

What’s really going on?

So, the current crisis has deep roots. Some are in the inherent dynamics of capitalism, others in the particular form current capitalism has taken (neo-liberalism). More specifically, it’s about the crash of the shadow banking system — the part of the economy which is not regulated by financial laws or the state. The shadow banking system is about the same size as the regulated banking system (which is our banks, loans, credit etc), and has grown by the trillions (!!!) in the last 10 years or so. It’s basically a way for banks, corporations and other financial institutions to make more money outside of state regulations — a free and invisible market. And it was great for a while — corporations and the elite were getting richer and richer, lining their pockets with our cash — until the bubble burst, proving the theory that neo-liberalism, capitalism, and the free market would NOT continue to sort itself out.

To look at the crash of the shadow banking system, we have to look at the regular banking system and how it all works within capitalism.

The Banking System

When we put our money into the bank, the bank only keeps a fraction of it in reserve. The rest of our money is actually lent out by the bank as credit or loans. So, if we all went into the bank and asked for our money back, they wouldn’t have it.

This is how a bank makes its money — not by gaining more accounts, or by people making re-payments — but by banks constantly creating more loans and credit. So when we ask for loans from the bank, we are actually borrowing from other peoples accounts and debts, which for the bank, has an element of risk. Because of these risks, when you get a loan, the bank decides how dodgy you are (credit rating, liabilities etc) and gives you a risk factor rating.

Technically, a bank has regulated limits on how much risk it can take on board, and this effects how many loans it can give out to people. So, once it’s reached its maximum risk limit, it can’t give out anymore loans and therefore can’t make anymore credit or money. This is where shadow banking comes in.

Shadow banking allows banks and other financial institutions to continue trading after reaching their regulated limits. What happens is banks can sell their risks onto other financial companies, who, for a price, agree to manage that risk for them. These are called credit derivatives, and allow banks to keep their risk ratings down, their books balanced, and their loans flowing. It worked out to be profitable for both parties, and quickly grew as a new, invisible, and untapped market as another way for capitalists to get even richer.

The flipside of this is that the debt and risk gets spread around these corporations, making global links amongst firms, banks and nations — the individual banks’ risks suddenly becomes a huge collective risk, all linked together. All good, until part of the chain goes bust and brings everyone down with it, including our major banks. This is basically what is happening today.

2008...

With the crisis in the finance markets rumbling on, it is hard to make any specific comments on it all, as it is sure to become outdated. What is clear, as stated above, is its roots lie in the nature of financial capital and capitalism — its tendency to generate market ‘bubbles,’ as resources are poured into specific markets (such as housing) in an attempt to make more and more money. Using our money, the system and those who benefit from it (bankers, investors, corporations, governments) gamble with huge risk, dancing dangerously between dollars and debt.

Needless to say, the most serious consequences of this risk and when it all goes wrong are usually suffered by working people — who can lose our jobs, health and even our lives — depending on how the gambled risks of the wealthy turn out in an unstable, illogical financial world. In short, it is blatant class robbery which usually fixes the problems they made. As such, it is one thing to gamble your own income on a risky decision, but quite another when that decision can ruin the lives of millions of others. Such is the power capitalism gives to a small few, while the rest of us are forced sell our labour and work for our incomes, just to live day to day!

What about New Zealand?

Bank guarantees (ie bailouts) have just been announced in Aotearoa by the government in an attempt to tell us that our banking system and our deposits are safe, and that the government will pump 150 billion of dollars into our banks if needed. So, where will that money come from? In short, from you and me. Costs will be passed on to us via raised fees and taxes, cuts in our wages — in short, forcing us to clean up a mess we did not create. If proof is needed on just how illogical and unjust the capitalist system is, then we needent look far...

What Now?

With the panics in the finance markets, now is an ideal time for looking at alternative ways of living. Anarchists argue that running an economy based on allowing the few to control, gamble and profit from the labour of the many is not only immoral, it does not work.

We need a society which is not based on bribing the rich to ensure investment and economic development. We need, as anarchists have long argued, an economy in which those who do the work control both it and its product. Capitalism needs to be ended, not propped-up by government regulation and bank guarantees. Any solution to the current panics will be paid for by the working class and the elite will, as always, benefit from the sacrifices of the many. If we remain quiet then any bailout to financial institutions will reflect the interests of big business, no strings attached. If we remain quiet then the costs of recovery will be inflicted on us in the shape of rising unemployment, lower wages, higher taxes. If we remain quiet, then neo-liberalism will shrug off this crisis like the previous ones and continue privatising the gains while socialising the losses and costs.

Our task as workers is to raise our voices and engage in direct action. Attempts to cut wages must be resisted, as we did not create this crisis and because it will make it worse. Attempts to close workplaces must be meet by occupations. Attempts to evict families from their homes must be stopped. We need to socialise the means of life, not have them run by a few capitalists or state/socialist bureaucrats. To do that, we need to organise in our communities and our workplaces, building horizontal forms of equal, direct democracy, and build an alternative to a system in crisis — one based on solidarity, mutual aid, libertarian socialism, and freedom.

crash!.pdf

Related

http://www.anarchistfaq.org

http://www.myspace.com/garagecollective

Comments

Re: CRASH! A Look at Today's Financial Crisis in Plain English

"When we put our money into the bank, the bank only keeps a fraction of it in reserve. The rest of our money is actually lent out by the bank as credit or loans."

As I understand it, a registered trading bank (the kind you and I generally have an account or a loan, or mortgage with) can lend out *10 times* the money that customers have deposited with it. Which is another reason why...

"if we all went into the bank and asked for our money back, they wouldn’t have it."

They charge interest on all that created money, and this income, less operating expenses, is profit. The money created through interest increases the 'money supply' (amount of money in the economy), without increasing the amount of stuff available to be bought with it, which creates 'inflation' (where each dollar is worth less than before, because it represents a smaller share of the same economic pot).

The hands-on way to control inflation is to reduce the amount of interest being paid, by raising interest rates, making people more hesitant to put things on credit. However, this obviously reduces profits, both for the banks themselves and the capitalist class in general. Inflation can also be avoided if new products and services are created fast enough to soak up the extra spending power, which is why most political parties and all capitalists are obsessed with exponential "economic growth". They need new commodities to soak up all the extra money they are creating through interest and lining their pockets with.

Could well misunderstand some important points here and would welcome alternative interpretations.

Strypey

Re: CRASH! A Look at Today's Financial Crisis in Plain English

Thanks Strypey,

I just concentrated on what I needed to put across as simply as I could, so thanks for adding the part about inflation etc etc. I'm no expert or anything on all this, so any additions are welcome.

Jared D
Garage Collective

Re: CRASH! A Look at Today's Financial Crisis in Plain English

Just thought I'd add something about loans and interest.

Basically the money paid back on the interest comes from nowhere.

example: You get a $1000 loan with 10% interest. So you're paying $1100 back. But this extra $100 doesn't come from anywhere, it's not created like the $1000. Eventually this will catch up on itself, but because the system is so large it is taking a while..

The only way you pay back the extra is by working and getting more money, but since almost all money is loan money, every now and then someone falls victim to the shortage because of the extra interest that doesn't exist and gets fucked over.

Re: CRASH! A Look at Today's Financial Crisis in Plain English

Hi Jared,

I think it is great that you are distributing this at work.

My main difference in opinion would be over the suggestions for action at the end. Whilst I don't disagree with the suggestions about people helping each other at a grassroots level, I also think demands for reforms have to be made on national governments.

It seems as though the right and left sides of the political establishment are differing somewhat in their response to the crisis. The right is calling for cuts in state spending and other neo-liberal measures to try to 'balance the books' and lay the foundations for a new business cycle, while the left is calling for neo-Keynesian policies like the injection of more money into the economy to boost consumer spending.

In the US, for instance, Obama has announced an emergency plan for a Roosevelt-style 'New New Deal', whereas McCain is promising to freeze increases in government expenditure.

In NZ, Clark is trying to stimulate the economy, while reminding voters that National responded to the recession of the early '90s by cutting spending, an act that made the downturn worse.

I think that the left and the unions should take a strong stance against the right's plans to respond to the recession by cutting spending. Spending cuts would deepen a recession by reducing consumer demand and throwing large numbers of people out of work.

We should support increased spending as a response to the crisis, but demand that it go to the people at the bottom, not to business. Helen Clark has announced the universalisation of the student allowance, and this will help in a small way to maintain consumer spending while cutting levels of private debt (students won't have to borrow as much to study). But we should call for the government to stimulate demand by, reversing the benefit cuts of 1991, raising the minimum wage, and taking GST off food and necessities, and so on.

Re: CRASH! A Look at Today's Financial Crisis in Plain English

I like the 'pass the parcel' analogy of debt-based capitalism. The taxpayer has just been left with a very large bill. How large, nobody yet knows.

Re: CRASH! A Look at Today's Financial Crisis in Plain English

Study Marx's written work about fictive capitalism. It is there that this great genius and scientific economist explains that because of exessive surplus values there arises a time when paper shuffling occurs in which the monopolies in search of new profits begin to exchange paper values with no real capital expansion. Private Financial houses spreading mortages beyond their real value. This value has no real value. It is fictive capitalism. It is fraud and theft. It is nowadays the reason all the largest financial conglomerates are failing to credit their exchanges. What increases this fraud is the looting of the public treasury by the military for their aggressive wars that create in their turn no useful positive values but only destroy the real capital and depress the peoples livability and inhibit the air, land, and water to the point of threatening the entire livability of the planet. Such action speeds up the fictive paper shuffling till no one believes in the process and thusly the whole exchange plummets to record lows of production and distribution of true and worthwhile commodities of life. It is then that a new bursting out is felt, a pressure that is inexcapable and which if followed to climax explodes into new relationships that plan for only positive productive materialism that defeats the old relationships of class struggle and its old drag on society for nothing but fictive reasons--- socialist society. Such harkens a new organic revolution that puts an end to all that blocks its way to liberation and an end to exploitation from all sources of fictation including the present man woman question with fictive equality, when only real equality is ecological organic green balance which allows the ture natural liberation of the species to occur.