2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
The eight finalists for the 2008 Roger Award for the Worst Transnational Corporation Operating in Aotearoa/New Zealand are (in alphabetical order): ANZ, BAT (British American Tobacco NZ), Contact Energy, GlaxoSmithKline, Infratil, McDonalds, Rio Tinto Aluminium NZ (nominated under its former, better known, name of Comalco) and Telecom.
There is one, self-explanatory, finalist for the Accomplice Award – Business New Zealand.
Telecom, the winner of the 2007 Roger Award, is the only transnational corporation (TNC) to have been a finalist every year since the Roger Award started more than a decade ago (although it has only actually won it twice). This year it was nominated for a multitude of sins, ranging from overcharging for mobiles to outsourcing New Zealand jobs to the Philippines.
Infratil is the only one not to have featured before, all the rest have previously been finalists (although none of them have ever won it). This tells you something about these corporate recidivists.
BAT just keeps on finding new and inventive way to sell and promote a product which kills up to 5,000 New Zealanders a year. ANZ was nominated for reasons ranging from profiteering to outsourcing and very specifically for its role in the ING scandal. Contact Energy was nominated for shoving up its power prices while simultaneously increasing its directors’ fees and because of the environmental dangers posed by its Gasbridge proposal in Taranaki.
McDonalds and Infratil are there because of their bashing of workers and unions (in the case of Infratil, this specifically involved the lockout of Wellington bus drivers by its NZ Bus subsidiary). GlaxoSmithKline was nominated because of the cockup with its reformulated thyroid drug Eltroxin, which adversely affected a large number of New Zealanders. And Rio Tinto Aluminium NZ (the old Comalco), was nominated for a range of reasons, but primarily for being a corporate bully with its constant threats to pack up and leave if it doesn’t get its way (despite being the biggest recipient of corporate welfare in NZ, vis a vis its power price).
We’ve just had an election but all that establishes is which party gets to administer the economy for the next three years. These guys are the ones who actually own it – and no New Zealanders get a vote for them. So this is a real election, whereby Kiwis get to say which of our owners has had the most negative impact on our country this year.
And the Roger Award is more relevant than ever, with the election of a Government full of throwbacks to the 90s’ mantra of “what is good for Big Business is good for New Zealand”. Not only that, we actually have the original Roger back from the political grave and Roger Kerr, Mr Full Speed Ahead To The Past himself, back in favour. It’s déjà vu all over again!
The criteria for judging are by assessing the transnational (a corporation which is 25% or more foreign-owned) that has the most negative impact in each or all of the following categories:
Economic Dominance - Monopoly, profiteering, tax dodging, cultural imperialism
People - Unemployment, impact on tangata whenua, impact on women, impact on children, abuse of workers/conditions, health and safety of workers and the public
Environment - Environmental damage, abuse of animals
Political interference – Interference in democratic processes, running an ideological crusade
The judges are: Geoff Bertram, from Wellington, a Victoria University economist; Brian Turner, from Christchurch, immediate past President of the Methodist Church and social justice activist; Paul Corliss, from Christchurch, a life member of the Rail and Maritime Transport Union; Cee Payne-Harker, from Dunedin, Industrial Services Manager for the NZ Nurses’ Organisation and health issues activist; Christine Dann, from Banks Peninsula, a writer and researcher; and Bryan Gould, from Bay of Plenty, a former Waikato University Vice-Chancellor. The winner(s) will be announced at an Auckland event in March 2009.
The Roger Award is organised by the Christchurch-based groups, Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa (CAFCA) and GATT Watchdog. Bad luck to all the finalists and may the worst man win!
Murray Horton
Secretary/Organiser
(03) 3663988/ 0274 307742
CAFCA
Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa
Box 2258, Christchurch, New Zealand
cafca@chch.planet.org.nz
Related



Comments
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
how fucking gay,,, what year will Dow Agrosciences be recognized for causing the most longest lasting harm?? (NZ #1 in world for cancers) the roger award judges must be dow shareholders, like nearly every other kiwi.
To ask the obvious questions..
... Why are foreign corporations more "evil" than local ones? Do you have any more control over a local corporation? Or a local capitalist for that matter? Does the government? And when did the state last act in "our" interests? Who are we? Why does cafca assign moralistic values like "satanic" and "evil" to corporations? Why don't we critique capitalist values and relationships? What about precarity? What would winning look like? Would I get a place on the board? I have a passport..
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
What about Fonterra?
They're clearly the worst of the worst,
[please dont say: coz they're a Co=operative]
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
Whatever .. just so long as we dont have to buy the railways back again .. the Rothscild Bank and its various business agents own New Zealand. Sir Roger sold it to them in 1984.
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
"Why are foreign corporations more "evil" than local ones?"
For one, because they're usually an awful lot bigger. Some have more money and economic clout than small nations. Nobody likes to be invaded.
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
What about the Yellow Pages Group www.yellowpagesgroup.co.nz since they are foreign owned, outsourced the 018 call center to South East Asia from Palmerston North and practice unitarist industrial relations?
Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
Yellowpaper is no better than Telecon because they export jobs to the Philippines; waste money on advertising all the while paying lousy stipends to the staff, so that they need welfare, state housing and food banks and browbeat them with extravagant performance appraisals.
Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
The reason why I pulled my advertising from the phone books and its internet equivalent is because management are pompous unitarist despots that treat employees without respect.
Re: Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
I cancelled my advertising with the telephone books once I learnt that so many people were been flown around New Zealand for conferences and road-shows. I just wasn’t happy to pay such high fees so that this can occur. To think flying around in planes burns fossil fuels that damage our ecosystem as well.
Yellow is not environmentally responsible
I dumped my Yellow marketing too once I found out that they fly lots of people around the country. The other reasons are all of the paper that they use in their phonebooks and of all of their cars that they have on the roads. This is not environmentally responsible or thinking of our children’s future.
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
I ditched my ads with yellowcages as well once I learnt that all what I was paying for was to fly people to conferences, roadshows and overseas junkets that no one really cares about. Delighted I have now considering the impact this has on the ecology.
Re: Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
I withdrawled my support when 018 was exported overseas.
I know top management boast that the yellow and white pages is a NZ iconic brand but...
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
Me 2!
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
I as well!!!
Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
I wouldn’t worry about the Yellow Pages Group since they have a reputation for being an employer best to be avoided. Take for example in Otauhahi where on their front door they have an advert on it saying that there is a job vacancy in its office and it has been there for over six months. This smells of desperation to me and the job is an internal sales rep, which is really a telemarketing role. (Nobody in their right mind would want this type of work, anyhow.) So it looks like that the company has shot themselves in the foot for being such harsh employers.
Re: Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
This firm does have a very poor standing in society because of its cruel treatment of people i.e. staff and customers.
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
It is because Yellowpaper follows Telecon's business methods: capitalism with unitarist overtures.
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
fonterra has gotta rate somewhere surely!
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
Telecon is jolly naughty!
http://indymedia.org.nz/newswire/display/75362/index.php
Re: Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
With all the staff been constructively dismissed no wonder my telephone bill is so high as I am paying for all of the pay outs.
Nice to see Telescam's share price being so low anyhow. If they behave like a plastic American company them they deserve to be trated as such!!!
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
Yeah, ANZ, BAT, Fonterra, McDonalds, Telecon, Yellowpaper and the like only exist to make the selected few more money than what they already have, while they rape the planet. Why anybody works for these people that everyone else detests is beyond me. Boycotte these firms, so that their revenue suffer.
PITY THAT THE 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS LIST IS NOT LONGER
I am sure the organisers of this would have like to have added more unitarist/capitalist outfits, like Burger King, Fonterra, SAFE, Shell, The BNZ and YellowPages, to the finalists list since many of them do run battery hen farms/sweet shops for their employees and trash The Earth. However, if they did include every business that does this then the list would have been far too long to be practical, so only the worst of the worst are in the final to “win” the Roger Award.
Safe Rocks!!!!
Go back under your bridge troll/s!!!!
Meat is murder
Save the whales
Free the dolphins
Ban all llama trains
Only a free range hen is a happy hen
Release the pigs
Quit meat
Vegans rule
Safe Rocks?
If you do not like same sex couples speaking as one then perhaps the NZNF is for you and drop the animal rights rhetoric since it is a turn off.
On the topic of SAFE: it does follow unitarist and capitalist practices by having only individual employment agreements and not a collective employment agreement with a union and by selling merchandise in a shop with a large mark up for a profit. It also trashes The Earth by the reams and reams http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Units_of_paper_quantity#Ream of paper that they dump. So why anyone believes otherwise is beyond us. (If any of you want to find out more about unitarism then go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_relations and read the perspective theories.)
Now back on the main topic of finalist list: we believe that the outfits that made it deserve it and we are sure the organisers would like to extend it to include more but for practical reasons they have to keep it to a limited number.
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
It’s a shame that Lane Walker Rudkin didn’t qualify.
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
wonder if spotless got anywhere
Re: 2008 ROGER AWARD FINALISTS NAMED
With this unimaginative spam the troll must be bored.