Two more arrests as protests continue at ASB stadium

Today protests continued at ASB stadium during the tennis match of the Israeli tennis player, Shahar Peer. The vocal crowd of about 30 protestors, had become emboldened by five unlawful arrests on the previous day. Consequently, two further arrests occured for simply yelling into a megaphone.
In an effort to drown out the protester's message, ASB stadium had gone to such lenghts as to hire a live band to perform across from the picket line. Unforunately for them not much could be done once Shahar Peer's tennis match began. Two protesters on a magaphone were quickly warned by police that if they did not stop the disturbance they would be arrested. Officers then moved in, and considerable media presence led to a dramatic arrest.
The police were very intent on keeping any sound device from being used in the area. After a couple of hours, it seemed as though the police were moving in to make further arrests of those left chanting. People by this time had began to disperse so it was decided amongst us to move along before potential further confrontation.
Shahar Peer lost her match shortly after we left.
Free, free Palestine!



Comments
brilliant & effective demo
Brilliant work by all at the demo today! And it worked!!! There is no way Shahar Peer can pretend the shouts - timed to conincide with her about to serve - didn't rattle her. And so they should. It would rattle any human to be reminded that the military she was so proud to serve in was enforcing an apartheid state...
Well done to all, and kia kaha to those arrested. Hopefully, police will get a smack on the knuckles from the courts for that. The cops should face disciplinary action for such egregiously illegal action.
All the protesters came
All the protesters came across as a bunch of neo-nazis, exactly what they are. Now all of New Zealand knows it.
Jews are not allowed to pray at their holiest site, the Temple Mount. Only muslims are allowed to pray at the Temple MOunt, because muslims can't allow people they consider sub-humans (all non-muslims) to pray at Judaism's Holiest site.
Jews are not allowed to live in Gaza and in most of Judea and Sammaria, and have had their towns annihalated because arabs can't bring themselves live alongside non-arabs.
It's time to end arab colonial occupation of Jewish land.
End the Islamic supremacist inspired Apartheid now!
How many palestinians are
How many palestinians are enjoying a game of tennis in gaza?
Not many. They are busy building Kassam rockets to kill more innocent people and teaching their kids how to blow themselves up in the service of Allah. No time for tennis when you're building rockets of death and blowing yourself up.
Prominent PLO Arab says there
Prominent PLO Arab says there are no 'Palestinians' and no "Palestine"
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.
"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism. "
-------------------------------------------------------
former Member of Knesset Azmi Bishara denying the existence of a “Palestinian” nation.
“Well, I dont think there is a Palestinian nation at all. I think there is an Arab nation. I always thought so and I did not change my mind. I do not think there is a Palestinian nation, I think its a colonialist invention - Palestinian nation. When were there any Palestinians? Where did it come from? I think there is an Arab nation. I never turned to be a Palestinian nationalist, despite of my decisive struggle against the occupation. I think that until the end of the 19th century, Palestine was the south of Greater Syria.”
The Qur'an 17:104 - states the land belongs to the Jewish people
If the historic documents, comments written by eyewitnesses and declarations by the most authoritative Arab scholars are still not enough, let us quote the most important source for Muslim Arabs:
"And thereafter we [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd'.".
017.104
YUSUFALI: And We said thereafter to the Children of Israel, "Dwell securely in the land (of promise)": but when the second of the warnings came to pass, We gathered you together in a mingled crowd.
PICKTHAL: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.
SHAKIR: And We said to the Israelites after him: Dwell in the land: and when the promise of the next life shall come to pass, we will bring you both together in judgment.
- Qur'an 17:104 -
Look at all those
Look at all those goose-stepping nazis in those photos.
Some things never change.
Eating babies
Am I the only baby eater who wonders where all the time fundamentalist zionists and mosad agents get to make posts by "pro-jewish muslim".
This is about Israel, not Jewish people.
Spamming websites is an
Spamming websites is an important aspect of any counter-terrorist operation.
Well atleast you're finally
Well atleast you're finally admitting that you are terrorists.
Who says you people are too far gone for help!
See! Some progress at last.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
During a 1968 appearance at Harvard University, a student stood up and asked Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to address himself to the issue of Zionism. The question was clearly hostile. King responded, “When people criticize Zionists they mean Jews, you are talking anti-Semitism.”
good to see this in
good to see this in mainstream press,
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10619307
Selective protesting against
Selective protesting against sports events is hypocracy. Any state that commits genocide should face this type of protest irregardless, so good on those activists that took this initiative.
I read McCartens piece on the protests and I think the bit he is missing is that the cops know full well their arrests will not stand up in court. I believe they do not commit these types of unlawful acts with that in mind, but since there is noone to hold their feet to the fire for their actions, they are able to use these faux arrest techniques as an affective method of disrupting a protest and circumventing ones right to protest...when it suits their political point of view.
I have just been reading on a
I have just been reading on a blog about this ,can the police legally confiscate megaphones? and then destroy them? does that mean everytime i want to use a megaphone on a protest i run the risk of having it taken off me and destroyed!...........
Genuine questions here ,would like to hear from those in the know
thanks
Arrest
If you're disturbing the peace, or the police suspect you of committing an offence such as unreasonably disrupting an audience in a public place, the police can arrest you and take your megaphone. They should (i.e. are required to by law) give it back when you're released, unless they plan to use it as evidence against you in Court.
The problem is, if they don't give it back, or it is "accidentally broken" when they are trying to take it off you, there is not much you can do about it. Suing the police will cost more than the megaphone - you might as well go out and buy a new one.
Edit: Sorry, scrub that, the
Edit: Sorry, scrub that, the first bit is wrong. Real story below.
If the police think you're unreasonably disrupting an audience they can arrest you (and take your megaphone) only if you fail to give you're name and address on demand, or if they think you're lying about your name and address. Unreasonably disrupting an audience is a summary offence and carries a fine of up to $200 on conviction.
The other option is if the police have cause to suspect that you're acting in a disorderly manner "that is likely in the circumstances to cause violence against persons or property to start or continue". Then the police can arrest you (and take your megaphone) without anything further.
The rest of what I said still holds though. They should give your megaphone back when they release you, unless they plan to use it as evidence for a prosecution. However, there is not much you can do if they don't or if they break it.
What you miss of course is
What you miss of course is the obvious link between the megaphone, and that loudspeaker system on the top of mosques. The cops just see this minime version of those mosque megaphone, and they see the obvious link to Al Qaeda terrorism that we all miss.
Weapons of Mass Disruption
I wondered what the anti-terror units at Harlec house had been working on. New Zealand's now has its very own take on WMDs, Weapons of Mass Disruption and MMDs Megaphones of Mass Disruption.
"Executive Office of the
"Executive Office of the President of the United States" + "www.police.govt.nz" = NZ is one of the Unites States?
US of NZ
"Executive Office of the President of the United States" + "www.police.govt.nz" = NZ is one of the Unites States?
Dow Chemical in Paritutu should have made you all realise this long ago.
you are the shitty state. ( few actually know just how shitty tho)