Great stuff, but does anyone believe this makes any sense?
'Israel to end the occupation of territories it captured in 1967, and subsequent wars, to facilitate the establishment of a viable and independent Palestinian state'
How can a viable state exist on such tiny non-contiguous parcels of land? You're talking about a Bantustan. And why should Arabs continue to be second class citizens in Israel, which is what they'll always be in a Jewish state?
I think the protest movement prompted by the latest war should give some serious thought to backing a one-state solution of a secular, democratic, bicultural Palestine.
Re: Protest against Israel's actions in The Mid-East in Wellington
Date Edited: 06 Aug 2006 02:13:30 PM
'Israel to end the occupation of territories it captured in 1967, and subsequent wars, to facilitate the establishment of a viable and independent Palestinian state'
How can a viable state exist on such tiny non-contiguous parcels of land? You're talking about a Bantustan. And why should Arabs continue to be second class citizens in Israel, which is what they'll always be in a Jewish state?
I think the protest movement prompted by the latest war should give some serious thought to backing a one-state solution of a secular, democratic, bicultural Palestine.