Josh - your name is just as anonymous as "anonymous" posters-we still don't know you from a bar of soap- why don't you put your full name and address down? :)
A lot of people who visit this site don't believe in laws. A good example of the ridiculousness of laws is the fact that people like Rickards get away with gang rape. In an anarchist society those types of people would have been dealt with by using 'community justice'.
Demofem

Ha ha ha. No fear, I don't want any night time visits. If I thought you were heading round for a cup of tea, you'd have it, but I'm not sure that's your intention :).

What I meant by the anonymous comment is that is impossible to follow a persons thoughts in here as everyone is posting anonymously. It's good to see you've started putting your name against yours. I like to know who is responding to what I have said and what they have said before. Context is important.

Anarchist society is mob rule. How much rape do you think there would really be in this type of environment? Gangs, which you would probably call 'collectives' would thrive. Do you really think women would thrive in an environment where physical strength wins? Not everyone in an anarchist society will have the same views as you. I used to think that 'Rational Anarchy' (I know it's an oxymoron, but it is a real structure), had a place, but I no longer believe this either.

Josh - your name is just as anonymous as "anonymous" posters-we still don't know you from a bar of soap- why don't you put your full name and address down? :)
A lot of people who visit this site don't believe in laws. A good example of the ridiculousness of laws is the fact that people like Rickards get away with gang rape. In an anarchist society those types of people would have been dealt with by using 'community justice'.
Demofem