"We are standing up and saying. 'Hey! We are sick of government and government-run Maori agencies taking the very little of what is left in our kapata (cupboard)'" said Hune Papuni of the East Coast tribe
Te Whānau-a-Takimoana. At a hui over the weekend, it was decided that tribal land situated within the Takimoana rohe be excluded from any Crown/Ngati Porou Treaty negotiations process or settlement and the Takimoana Government Deed of Constitution and Takimoana Governing Council Rules of Procedure were ratified as the final steps in setting up the whanau/hapu level government structure. More than 50 people attended the meeting in
Rangitukia. The Takimoana tribal leadership assert that the tribes of the independent East Coast territory did not cede sovereignty to the British Crown in 1840, and so the New Zealand government has no legal right to rule them. Te Whānau-a-Takimoana was an autonomous tribe of the independent northern East Coast territory of Aotearoa, which held complete sovereignty over the rohe before 1840. The Te Tiriti o Waitangi ki Te Tai Rawhiti (Maori version not English translation) signed at Rangitukia on June 1, 1840 was the prevailing treaty between Takimoana and Queen Victoria and Article 2 of the Tiriti did not cede sovereignty.
"It is about exercising our constitutional and sovereign rights, to attain a full measure of government over our territories including our foreshore, seabed, inland waterways, territorial seas, fisheries and airspace, to promote our own wellbeing, to put an end to the crimes and abuses committed against us by the New Zealand government, marginalisation of our human and property rights, the exploitation of our natural resources, to promote authentic biculturalism, social progress and better standards of life for all New Zealanders" said Tamati Reid of Rangitukia
A council of 16 kaitiaki (councillors) who are of Takimoana descent make up the new government body. The constitution and rules together provided the pathway towards the repossession of stolen lands and resources, and were instruments to convert theory into practice, he said.
"This kaupapa has been years in the planning. It's about our fundamental rights and freedoms to control our own destiny as promised to us in our treaty" said Tamati Reid. Kaumatua and Justice of the Peace Bob Kaa said he believed their initiative was sanctioned by the UN and could be the catalyst for a major shake-up of New Zealand's constitutional arrangements. One of the first priorities of the proposed government would be governance capability-building through strategies aimed at restoring the tribe's economic base. "Policy development on repossessing our foreshore and seabed and other lands unlawfully taken by successive settler governments will be a priority area for the Takimoana government," said Mr Kaa.
"It may take a long time for our people to do a U-turn of course — it took them 100 years to be colonised. This is not an anti-Pakeha movement — they are most welcome to come to the meeting. It doesn't discredit any Pakeha, nor does it aim to take away any of their rights — 99 percent of us have a significant amount of that ancestry ourselves."
Comments
Re: East Coast tribe going autonomous!
Nga Mihi nui Te Whanau a Takimoana
Tinorangatiratanga in action Awesome and an inspiration for all Haapu & iwi throughout Aotearoa & Indigenous peoples throughout the world.
Re: East Coast tribe going autonomous!
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
rock n roll folks, your nation's birth is long over due.
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
There's a somewhat similar case to this one up north, where a Nga Puhi hapu is making a claim for the grounds where the Treaty was signed. And in 2004, at the height of the furore over the seabed and foreshore legislation, another East Cape hapu tried to break away from Ngati Porou, and even declared the area around the settlement of Potaka to the west of Hicks Bay independent. The hapu wanted to set up a fish farming venture that would create jobs and benefit hapu members. After a few weeks, though, the inititive was abandoned and some sort of reconciliation with the Ngati Porou runanga was achieved.
The Ngati Porou runanga was itself opposed to the foreshore and seabed, but eventually reached a deal with the government whereby a certain quota of fish farming licenses were guaranteed to iwi members. In February Ngati Porou became the first iwi to formally endorse Labour's foreshroe and seabed legislation; as a result they have received a very watered-down acknowledgement of their 'legal ownership' of the coastline of their rohe.
Ever since the pro-government forces won out in a Ngati Porou civil war in the 1860s, the iwi has had a relatively conservative, conciliatory leadership, symbolised by Apirana Ngata. The iwi's willingness to sign up to labour's seabed and foreshore legislation reflects this tradition.
If the Takimoana hapu is challenging the politics of the Ngati Porou runganga leadership, then this is positive. But it's hard to see how such a small number of people can build a viable 'economic base', let alone maintain an independent state, and the splintering of a mighty iwi like Ngati Porou into a thousand hapu alienated from each other would not be a good idea, either. One of the negative aspects of the Treaty process has been the way it has splintered some iwi, or turned iwi with a long history of good relations against each other. A good example is the relationship of Tuhoe and the smaller iwi Ngati Whare. they fell out over forestry claims, and Tuhoe political unity has suffered as a result. For this reason I hope that the Takimoana hapu do not try to separate themselves from Ngati Porou and present themselves as an indepdent iwi.
Ngati Porou needs to be united, and to unite with other progressive forces, like the ones represented on this website, so that it can push the government on issues like economic development.
The East Coast has still not recovered from neo-liberal 'reforms' of 1984-99, and the closure of post offices, banks, mills, and freezing works. The government should be forced to pour money into health, education, and job creation on the East Coast. There has been some progress made with the setting up of the hospital at Te Puia Springs and the building of new state hosues at places like Onepoto. Fish farming has a big future. But a lot mroe money needs to go in. An independent state on a few square kilometres of land around the East Cape would not be able to find the funds for either social services or economic development.
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
NEW AVENUE FOR NGATI POROU PROTEST
An East Coast hapu has called a meeting in Rangitukia tomorrow to win support for a breakaway from the Ngati Porou runanga.
The agenda includes setting up an independent government for Te Whanau-a-Takimoana, taking over ownership of Whanga-o-kena, or East Cape Island, from the Crown, and not paying tax.
Jim Perry, who affiliates to Te Whanau-a-Takimoana, says it's a sign of the disharmony on the coast in the wake of the Government's decision to negotiate the region's claims with Te Runanga o Ngati Porou, rather than with the various independent hapu.
He says the runanga has already got the benefits of the fisheries settlement, and now it's going for land as well.
“And the hapu, who really have suffered under the grievance situation, have received nothing, so they’re setting themselves up so that they can now go to Government and say hey, we’re the ones that are now independent of the runanga, we want our share,” Mr Perry says.
Te Whanau-a-Takimoana did not sign the Treaty of Waitangi, so it does not concede any sovereignty to the Crown.
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
"Ngati Porou needs to be united, and to unite with other progressive forces, like the ones represented on this website, so that it can push the government on issues like economic development.
"An independent state on a few square kilometres of land around the East Cape would not be able to find the funds for either social services or economic development."
One answer: it's been done before, all across the planet and for thousands and thousands of years. It just depends on whether people let them or not and how able they are to defend themselves against those who are so threatened by their courage to be independent.
Kia kaha e te whanau! You inspire us...
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
why is the info cut off on the left hand side?...WE CANT READ IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!
Re: New life after and against colonisation - East Coast tribe going autonomous!