Aotearoa IMC : http://indymedia.org.nz
Aotearoa IMC

LOCAL News :: Class War : Elections & Legislation : Labour : Right Wing : State

RAM/SW is an apple

The Residents Action Movement began as an electoral front group in Auckland, formed largely by members of the Socialist Worker organisation. It originally ran only in the Auckland local body elections, and ran eight candidates in 2004. One of it’s candidates, Robyn Hughes, was elected to the Auckland Regional Council.

RAM did not fare so well in the 2007 local body elections, with it’s vote count for the Auckland Regional Council dropping to 76,000. It’s only councilor also lost her seat.

RAM has now made the decision to register for the general elections, and is trying to make the transition to becoming a nationwide political party. It has had limited success with this - while it has recruited a great number of people on the basis of it’s centre-left, liberal politics (it currently claims to have 2,400 paper members), it has yet to expand outside of Auckland in terms of an activist base, barring a handful of supporters in and around Wellington.

RAM’s policies are a mixture of social liberalism, New Zealand nationalism and bourgeois environmentalism, which RAM mashes together under the label “broad left”.

It is calling for the removal of GST from food, while retaining this anti-worker ad anti-poor flat tax on everything else, including other necessities such as petrol, clothes and electricity! So far, no explanation has been given as to why it will not abolish GST in it’s entirety, despite it’s claims to ” Put human beings and our planet before the almighty dollar”.

It is also calling for free and frequent public transport, reducing household rates, and raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour (the same level that reactionary parties such as New Zealand First are calling for).

RAM can be viewed essentially as a slightly more vocal version of the Greens. It does not claim to represent any particular class in New Zealand, and as a result inevitably ends up representing the interests of the wealthy, ruling class, as can be seen through it’s centreist policies.

It is surprising (and for radical leftists, saddening) that the once proud Socialist Worker organisation, successor to the Communist Party of New Zealand, has now reduced itself to the point where it openly endorses and has effectively dissolved itself into an electoral vehicle that describes itself as “a broad left coalition, stretching from social liberals, community activists and former National Party members to social democrats, democratic socialists and left-wing radicals.” Any organisation containing former National Party members cannot be especially left wing!

RAM may well receive a reasonable vote in the elections. It has watered down and moderated it’s politics to the extent that it has for just that reason. But the important thing to keep in mind is that these votes are not the votes of working-class people voting for the destruction of the capitalist system and the establishment of a socialist society - they are not even votes for anything radically different to the status quo! No, any votes that RAM recieves will be liberal votes, and any candidates it has elected will be operating within the restraints of a liberal platform.

It is clear that RAM does not represent anything radically different in New Zealand politics, and that it does not intend to make any substantial changes to New Zealand society and the system we live under. If that’s what you after, you’ll find it here.

RAM is a Granny Smith apple -green on the outside, white on the inside. The sad remnants of Socialist Worker are a Braeburn apple - red on the outside, white on the inside. The Workers Party is a tomato - red all the way through, and proud of it. We intend to keep it that way.
 
 
Comment on this article
Title
Author
  Create a new account ?
Text Format

Comment

Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

i'm a piece of coal. anarchist black right through and my rage burns right throught the night.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

Putting asside the rest of the article...

"...and raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour (the same level that reactionary parties such as New Zealand First are calling for)..."

The idea of fighting for a 2/3rds of the average wage/$15 campaign is actually a brilliant idea (and has been around for a lot longer than NZ First) and is something revolutionaries should be fighting for.

I beleive in abolishing wage slavery - but on the way to winning such a long term goal (although never hiding that that is the goal) acheiving something *winnable* is important. of course although its winnable, it will still be hard and would require widespread direct action (Strikes) to achieve. In the process it would radicalise workers towards our longer term goals.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

mmmm, I love tomatoes, can I take a bite? *comp chomp*
 

didn't the apple split?

Alastair says-

It is surprising (and for radical leftists, saddening) that the once proud Socialist Worker organisation, successor to the Communist Party of New Zealand, has now reduced itself to the point where it openly endorses and has effectively dissolved itself into an electoral vehicle that describes itself as “a broad left coalition, stretching from social liberals, community activists and former National Party members to social democrats, democratic socialists and left-wing radicals.” Any organisation containing former National Party members cannot be especially left wing!

BUT
didn't a lot of the younger SWers leave because of this reason to join other anti-capitalists in Socialist Aotearoa?
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

For those who want some more information on RAM there are plenty of posts on UNITYblogNZ.com (unityaotearoa.blogspot.com/)

In particular check out 'History calls for a broad left party' (unityaotearoa.blogspot.com/2008/03/history-calls-for-broad-left-party.html)

There are also some articles on UNITYblogNZ.com about the Venezuelan Revolution which are relevant. There are important lessons, I believe, to be learnt from how the revolutionary process has advanced in Venezuela.

The question for all of us is how to build a truly mass movement that can change society for the better. This is what RAM is trying to do by relating to where workers and other grassroots people are today.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

You should also point out that RAM is a rotten apple, with a sickening Stalinist bureaucracy in the middle.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

Coal - !? as an anarchist metaphor?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm

inflexible, polluting and non renewable.

Why not.

Two out of three ain't bad.
 

Grant Morgan is a bureaucracy?

Who are the "sickening Stalinist bureaucracy"? If you mean "Grant Morgan", then I should point out that bureacracies typically require more than one person.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

Grant's bureaucracy would be uncomfortably crowded if there was anyone else in it.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

"Any organisation containing former National Party members cannot be especially left wing!"

Doesn't that depend on their reasons for leaving the National Party? Would former Labour party members be more 'left wing' in your estimation? (eg Richard Prebble, Roger Douglas). So what happens to former mainstream party members in your revolutionary fantasies? Up against the wall?

If the history of sectarian Marxism (and sectarian anarchism for that matter) has taught us anything, it's that people usually reserve their strongest condemnation for their closest political neighbours. Blog on Alastair...

Strypey
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

"The Workers Party is a tomato - red all the way through, and proud of it. We intend to keep it that way."
Surely you mean a tomato that is part Maoist = red with the blood of murdered Chinese workers & part Trotskist = red with the blood of murdered Kronstadt anarchists? In other words: a vegetable that will make you sick?
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

most of the Kronstadt sailors were aligned with the SRs. Petrochenko the Saiolor, one of the leaders, went to fight for the WHites in the Finnish Civil War
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

The WP should be aware that one of their own historical predecessors infamously cautioned against "underestimating the peasantry".

Those of us who are regular agricultural labourers will know that most tomatoes in this greenhouse-sprinkled land are in fact red on the outside and light pink in the middle.

An even more apt similie for our horticulturally minded, and formerly maoist friends.

I
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

On a more serious note:

With the RAM annoncement there will now be two ostensibly "left" groupings attempting to appeal to workers in the upcomming elections, both led by socialists.
At least one other socialist group has called on this site for the building of a left united front in the current climate, and there are still apparently a few self-proclaimed socialists doing what they can in the alliance, (not to mention all the other individuals that have fallen along the way).

From reading their own publications, each of these groupings also each claim that they alone represent the genuine attempt to build a "post labour" or anti-capitalist, broad left or united front alternative to the current capitalist political "duopoly".

They also each claim in their own way that we should honour the past to prepare for the future (ie; learn from history).

Well, recent history in the region suggests that something like the Australian Socialist Alliance started well in creating a viable broad socialist left (for all its' later faults). Perhaps these comrades have some thoughts on this as well as the gardening.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

In response to the previous comment, I think WP would be all in favour of a joint revolutionary socialist electoral ticket - indeed back in 2002 when WP's predecessor the Anti-Capitalist Alliance was founded considerable efforts were made to involve other marxist groups (notably CWG and ISO) but sadly to no avail (the CWG insisted on something like a 50 point program of "transitional demands", while with one or two individual exceptions the ISO comrades weren't even interested in serious discussions).

As far as I understand it, our willingness to discuss joint electoral slates with other revolutionary leftists hasn't changed (eg last year we ran a joint candidate with ISO in the Dunedin local body elections). Our only "bottom line" would be that such a joint slate be clearly anti-capitalist and revolutionary, which would probably rule out working with SW/RAM and the Alliance although I'm sure there are individuals within those groups who still see themselves as marxists.

As far as the Australian Socialist Alliance is concerned, the main problem it seems to me with that regroupment effort was that it united a whole lot of revolutionary marxists behind what was essentially a lowest-common-denominator social-democratic reformist program. Unfortunately for them watering down their politics did not lead to the expected influx of disillusioned leftwing ALP supporters, who instead found a perfectly adequate expression for their political energies in the Greens. Since the Socialist Alliance prioritised votes over genuine revolutionary regroupment, it consequently was deprived of its fundamental raison d'etre.
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

CWGs "50 point program" in 2002
www.geocities.com/communistworker/cs45.html
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

Timbo,

The problem with SA in Oz wasn’t primarily for the reason you think.

In fact most of the groups involved there were not social democratic (in the Workers Party sense) and would have had no problem with what you say is WPNZ’s minimum for a socialist ticket: “anti-capitalism” and “revolution”.

My recollection is that the SA in Oz foundered due to internal machinations of one of the main groups (Green Left/DSP) who were able to use their size and resources to dominate the politics and machinery of the alliance in contradiction to the founding principles.

The question of what programme any such alliance would have is certainly important, but it is hardly an earth-shattering analysis to claim that the collective policy would be a “lowest common denominator”.
What else would it be?
A Common Denominator is by definition, the thing that all have in common (remember your primary school math).
Sticking the pejorative term, “lowest” in the front is unhelpful and unnecessarily emotive.

In fact the actual political quality of any agreed Common Denominator would depend on the ability of the constituent groups to carry out a thorough and constructive debate during the period in which they formed their collective policy.

Clearly you already know this because you state the WP has its own (“lowest” common denominator) that it would accept, namely: “Anti-cap and revo”.

As far as the CWG is concerned I checked their site as they suggested and there are in fact somewhat less than ’50 points” you dismissively imply.
Only 10 in fact.
More surprisingly, there was nothing there that I could see that you i the the WP would have too much of an issues with (except perhaps the number of exclamation marks).

But of course we both know that what you DO disagree with them (CWG) on, is the nature of the labour party and what to say to workers who may think of voting for that mob.

Well if this is what stops you having a united front then I suggest it is tactically inflexible of both of your organisations and your members should do something about it.

(Another aside, you may or may not know that in the 87 elections there was a homegrown Socialist Alliance here in NZ.
It was a United Front around an approximately 18 point programme (from memory) and included participation from at least 5 Socialist groups as well as numerous other individual socialists and activists from around the country.
My recollection was that there were differences over not only Labour, but also a host of much more fundamental issues. Yet this did not stop these comrades from working together on elections and other campaigns then and for some years afterwards).

Cheers,
I
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

I don't doubt that each of the constituent groups of the Australian Socialist Alliance were revolutionary - my point was rather that their common electoral program read more like it had been written by left social democrats. So in this case there was an obvious disjunction between what Socialist Alliance members believed (i.e. the impossibility of capitalism granting meaningful reforms) and the platform that they were campaigning on (which pretended that socialist demands could indeed be realised merely through a change of policy - eg money for schools not war).

Just touching on the other issue you raise, yes I do think it would be very diffcult and rather pointless to have as part of an anticapitalist electoral slate a group like the CWG which believes workers should in fact vote for a capitalist party i.e. Labour!
 

Re: RAM/SW is an apple

Tim,
Any demand that calls for a reform of capitalism rather than it’s abolition is a in a sense a social democratic demand.
For example, your Wellington WP candidate Don is calling for the abolition of GST.
Sounds radical.
But in fact there wasn’t any GST before 1 October 1986. I know I was there – and it wasn’t socialism.
So capitalism is quite capable of managing without GST. Clearly a call for the abolition of GST is not an anti-capitalist demand.

Does this mean your would also describe this part of your Workers Party policy as being “written by left social democrats”? ; )

In fact even Trotsky’s transitional demands are social democratic in the sense that they are not immediate calls for the abolition of wage slavery. They are reforms of capitalism. In fact during a period of upsurge in workers struggles it is probable that the capitalist class would reluctantly enact them in an attempt to contain the militancy. And even that would not mean the abolition of capitalism.

The quality that makes a reform demand useful for socialists (over and above it’s use in ameliorating some aspect of capitalist oppression) is its ability to lead workers from embracing it as an achievable goal to them using it as a springboard to questioning other aspects of capitalist reality.

So in the above example, the call to abolish GST is a fairly populist demand. But it can be used to extend a discussion about the social inequity of a tax on essentials into one that talks about social inequality generally and how this is rooted in a class system propped up on the unpaid labour of workers.

I have come across many socialist groups that have the most exemplary revolutionary demands, but their practice is to deliver them in a way guaranteed to alienate even other socialists they discuss them with, let alone any proletarians.

On the other hand I have also known those who, with a rudimentary set of reforms have engaged in exemplary organising, building up independent groups of workers able to take self organised action in their own right, let alone talking about it.

You tell me which were the better socialists…?

Cheers
I
 

Account Login

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software