The Mt Victoria Community held a public meeting tonight to consider their options, in the wake of the sale of the their community building by St Andrews on the Terrace presbyterian church. Danyl Strype went along to check out their response to the privatization of their treasured social space.
"For the love of money is the root of all evil"
Timothy 6:10, King James Bible
Some bad news for the supporters of the Mt Victoria icon known as
Crossways. Local residents, organized under the umbrella of a charitable entity called the Crossways Community Trust have worked for over a year to save the community centre. Despite their best efforts, Prebyterian church
St Andrews on the Terrace, have now sold the building to a property developer, claiming they need the cash for earthquake strengthening of their church. The buyer, Sheryl Gulliver, intends to renovate the building and sell it as a private home. It is a tragic irony that this social space that has hosted a number of meetings critical of privatization, and neoliberalism in general, has now itself been privatized.
At a public meeting on Thusday 21 August, a motion was passed to rename the trust to 'New Crossways Community Trust' and alter its purpose to include seeking to lease another building to house the evicted groups. There are around 40 community groups who regulary use the Crossways space for meetings and activities, including the Mt Victoria Residents Association. One of the hardest hit victims of the church's action is the parent-run community creche which has been operated out of Crossways for 25 years. Creche organizers explained that Mt Victoria has a dearth of buildings with outdoor areas, and since Ministry of Education regulations insist on a minimum outdoor space for any childcare facility, the creche has been hard-pressed to find a new home.
The only viable long-term option seems to be the disused Wellington Women's Bowling Club building known as 'Bandoliers'. Unfortunately it's on the edge of the green belt, and bound by a labyrinth of planning restrictions, and opposition from the open space lovers Friends of the Town Belt, who would prefer to see the building demolished. With the eviction deadline of October 9 looming, the creche supporters were pushing hard for the meeting to support them, either by insisting the New Crossways Community Trust look for a space with suitable outdoor space to allow the creche to continue operating, or by taking a supportive position on the creche group's proposal to use Bandoliers. However, the trustees claim to have their hands tied, in the first instance by the lack of suitable buildings, and in the second by the division within the Mt Vic community over the future of the Bandoliers building.
A possible compromise is the somewhat "dilapidated" Samoan Church hall, which has an open courtyard, previously used for growing taro. Talks between the creche and the Ministry of Education have produced a glimmer of hope that this may be allowable as a temporary home for the creche, while a more suitable long term solution is sought. This is one of three possible sites for 'New Crossways' which were tabled at the meeting. The other two proposals involved the lease of an office space above a tile shop, and a share arrangement with an after-care facility for people with intellectual disabilites and mental illness. Neither of these options includes outside space that would allow the creche to be part of the New Crossways.
To me, the situation is akin to the council suddenly deciding to sell the Aro Hall to earthquake strengthen the council offices, or the Lebanese Society deciding to sell 128 Abel Smith St. In each of these cases, one would hope that the user community be offered the first right of purchase, given the necessary time to fundraise, and perhaps given a slight discount if necessary for the sake of the community good. One would hope that the social objectives of these collective entities would be weighed in during decision-making, as well as purely financial matters.
As stated on their website, the St Andrews mission is to "create a lively, open Christian faith community, to act for a just and peaceful world, and to be catalysts for discovery, compassion and celebration in the capital." The sale of Crossways may be seen as fulfilling the first part of this, since strengthening St Andrews would ensure a space for that community, but to do so by crucifying the wellbeing of the Mt Victoria community is neither in the interests of a just world, nor is it much of an example of discovery or celebration, let alone compassion. The wealth of all christian churches in Aotearoa, especially their property wealth, is derived indirectly, and sometimes directly, from their role in the subjugation and dispossession of the tangata whenua. One would hope that with this in mind, the church would be mindful of its social justice debts while making decisions about its property assets.
However, the property barons who control the estate of St Andrews on the Terrace, insisted they would not sell the Crossways building at any less than its inflated market valuation. It seems they would rather sell the building to be turned into a private stately home than donate a fraction of their potential profit to allow the community to keep their only dedicated social centre. This seems especially absurd when the church accepted a $1.3 million purchase price from the developer, little more than the $1.2 million offered by the Crossways Community Trust in June, especially once real estate and marketing costs are chopped off.
This pursuit of the highest dollar value above all other values is the thinking of bankers, not followers of Christ, who righteous indignation at the commercial invasion of space set aside for the sacred and the social is recorded in Matthew 21 (
verse 13 is my favourite). Somebody needs to go drive the money-changers out of the temple.
Comments
Re: Mt Vic Community Resigned to Privatization of Crossways
Re: Mt Vic Community Resigned to Privatization of Crossways
The Church shared Crossways Community House with the local community for thirty years. It heavily subsidised operations paying rates, insurance and a proportion of utilities. It provided the people-power for the Management Committee, which also had representatives from the community. It employed ministers who were committed to working alongside the community. It was not an absentee landlord.
The Trust's initial 'offer' was $1.2 million but it didn't actually have that when the offer was made. Its only legitimate offer was $1 million in the tender process.
The church made the decision to sell Crossways in April last year because its other building, which is actually more heavily used by the community than is Crossways (by the same sorts of groups that use Crossways), was in need of huge urgent repair and earthquake strengthening. The overall cost is between $3.5 and 4 million. The church delayed the sale for over a year so the Trust could fundraise the $1.5 million goal it set. The delay cost the church significantly. That money would have gone into upgrading community facilities at St Andrew’s, which will have to wait until further fundraising can be undertaken. However, the congregation is determined to do this because it is committed to providing a place of hospitality in the city.
Making the decision to sell was a really tough decision for the church community. Many people in the congregation had a strong connection with Crossways, which had also been the home of a faith community, for many years. They are not wealthy or powerful people. They are, like those who tried to purchase Crossways, a community organisation. The property the church has was purchased as a result of the sacrificial gifts of ordinary people in earlier generations.
My perception is that Mt Victoria community* did not generously support the Trust. A small dedicated group of people did work very hard and were generous with time and money. Some of them were members of St Andrew's church. But the majority of people in Mt Victoria did not get behind the drive to save Crossways. Neither did the most of the charitable trusts from which grants were sought. $900,000 of the Trust's offer came from a mortgage and an interest-free deferred loan from a Trust.
The Wellington City Council didn't think that the Trust could sustain the repayments and interest, and declined to provide any financial support apart from helping St Andrew's manage some of the costs of the delay in sale.
It is curious that the role of the Council received no attention in your article.
Quoting Bible verses is easy. So is blaming others. But theology and life are more complicated than that. I support Indymedia and I support journalism that makes an attempt to hear both sides of a story. The good thing about Indymedia is that it provides an opportunity to respond. So thank you for that.
Margaret Mayman
St Andrew’s on The Terrace
* Some Stats on Mt Vic from 2001 census
The median income of people in Mt Victoria is $27,700, compared $18,500 for all of New Zealand.
The unemployment rate in Mt Victoria was 4.6 percent, compared with 7.5 percent for all of New Zealand.
The most popular occupational group in Mt Victoria was Professionals (25.8 percent).
Re: Mt Vic Community Resigned to Privatization of Crossways
Thanks for the your comments. I'm sure the initial decision to sell was not made lightly, and I'm equally sure the decision-makers at St Andrews would have agonized over the final sale. However, I think you will agree none of this changes the end result - a community space converted into a private space - privatization.
The worst affected in all this are the children attending the creche. Their opportunities for play and socializing are unlikely to be significantly improved by the statistics you offer, intended I assume to demonstrate the slightly above average financial status of their parents. Shutting down non-profit, parent-run, creches, playgroups, and playcentres is part of a wider agenda of creating a market for 'early childcare businesses', an agenda which the Ministry of Education is playing into, by imposing the same regulations on both types of groups, despite the obvious differences in their motivations and funding. The road to free market hell is paved with good intentions.
You are right in pointing out the council's pathetic role in this matter, and I intend this to be the subject of future articles as I follow the fortune of the parents attempting to save their creche. I will be arguing that a parent-run creche is a recreational activity group, not an early childhood education institution, and should be allowed the use the existing Bandoliers building on the edge of the Green Belt.
Considering the difference in property values between when St Andrews aquired the building through your merger with the Mt Vic church, and it's value now thanks to the real estate speculation of the last 10 years, it's a bit rich of you (pun intended) to begrudge the Mt Vic community the costs of your delaying the fall of the axe, especially since you admit the council effectively subsidized this. Perhaps St Andrew could donate a small amount of these ill-gotten gains to helping to rehouse the creche you have turned out on the street.
Thanks again for your feedback, and your interest in Indymedia.
Strypey
Re: Mt Vic Community Resigned to Privatization of Crossways
I am completely sympathetic about the plight of the Creche. And I'm glad to hear that they have now found alternative temporary facilities. I agree with you about their being able to use Bandoliers. I have been to meetings with creche parents as they've sought alternatives and made exactly the point that you do, that children playing should be considered recreation. I hope that Mt Vic residents will get behind the creche and support this use of the Bandoliers site.
Another piece of history you may not be aware of is that the creche was looking at alternative space before the parish made the decision to sell. Crossways was not ideal given the considerable compliance burdens faced by early childhood programmes, even nfp ones. I have to say that the creche parents have been very good to work with and rather than accusing us of turning them out on to the street, have acknowledged the years of support given by the church.
On the issue of property prices. The Council subsidized the interest on the loan we took to do the construction work this year. The loss in value due to the changing property market was not covered. And while property prices have increased exorbitantly, so have construction costs. Every cent that comes from the sale of Crossways is going to the contract to restore St Andrew's. I'm sure there would have been a public outcry if we'd sold that building or let it fall down around us.
As I wrote earlier, we had to make a hard choice. And we chose the building that was of greater historic value and used by more members of the Wellington community.
I understand the Crossways Trust has found a new property to lease for community space in Mt Victoria. Most of the furniture and chattels from Crossways will be given to the Trust. The remaining small portion will go into community spaces at St Andrew's for purposes both sacred and social.
Margaret